What are the two of them worth to your firm? Run your numbers

Two products. One legal team.

01 / 02The AssociateEmail
New messageSaved
To
associate@solicia.ai
Subject
Standing instruction

For every deal we do, run the post-closing checklist.

One email. The Associate remembers it, watches every new matter and briefs its Paralegal when the work is due.

Standing instruction savedApplies to every new transaction
02 / 02The ParalegalEmail
New messageSaved
To
paralegal@solicia.ai
Subject
Agreement summary

Please summarise every agreement in the attached packet. One column per agreement, with the commercial terms and post-closing obligations.

Agreement_packet.zip18 agreements · 46.2 MB
Attached
XLSX
Reply from The ParalegalTransaction_register.xlsx
Sources linked

Solicia.

The Paralegal works by email. The Associate works by email and phone—and remembers what your firm told it.

Meet The Associate Meet The Paralegal
Explore
The two of them

Two colleagues.
Already in your contacts.

The Paralegal answers your email. The Associate answers your email, your call and your Teams message — and comes back to you when only you can decide.

P

The Paralegal

Solicia

email
email
paralegal@solicia.ai
mobile
The Associate takes the calls
Teams
The Associate takes the meetings

Send it a task with the files. The finished document comes back in the same thread, addressed to you.

A

The Associate

Solicia

email call Teams
email
associate@solicia.ai
mobile
+64 9 887 0140
Teams
Solicia · The Associate

Give it the matter. It carries it, briefs the Paralegal itself, and rings you when only you can decide.

One system underneath

Two colleagues.
One record.

The Associate includes everything The Paralegal does. Both read from and write back to the same matter record — so nothing is learned twice, and nothing is lost in the hand-off between them.

  1. The AssociateCarries the matter, owns the next move
  2. The ParalegalProduces the working file
  3. Matter recordEvery source, decision and thread
Two ways to hand work over

Give the Associate a matter.
Ask the Paralegal for a file.

One address each, already in your contacts. Nothing to configure.

A
The Associateassociate@solicia.ai
Matters & work streams
  • Carry the Kestrel disclosure exercise to completion.A live work stream
  • Run the post‑closing checklist on every deal we close.A standing instruction
  • Take the PPSR discharges end to end — twenty counterparties.Chased and filed
It briefs the Paralegal itself, and comes back only where the judgment is yours.
P
The Paralegalparalegal@solicia.ai
Any legal work product
  • Summarise every agreement in the attached packet.XLSX
  • Mark up the services agreement against our template.DOCX
  • Index the data room and compile the signing bundle.ZIP
One email with the files. The finished document returns to the same thread.
Why a legal team, and not a chat box See the whole register of work

Ask it like a colleague.

Forward the thread, attach the files and write the email you would send to someone on your team.

The Paralegal · email

“Mark up this supply agreement against our North Quay precedent.”

Tracked changes, numbering and cross-references preserved.

Reply with working markup↗
The Paralegal · email

“Compare the four Kestrel SPAs and build the deviations table.”

Commercial terms, source references and live formulas included.

Reply with comparison↗
The Associate · email

“What did we agree with Talloway on audit rights last year?”

Answered from the matter record, with the source attached.

Firm context recalled↗
The Associate · email

“For every acquisition, run the post-closing checklist.”

Remembered once, applied to every future matter.

Associate owns the next move↗
The Associate · phone

“Call me when the last PPSR release lands.”

The same matter memory, available without opening a screen.

Triggered call↗
The Paralegal · email

“Draft the board minutes from the attached resolutions.”

Numbering and defined terms carried straight through.

Reply with working draft↗
The Associate · email

“Use the Talloway audit-rights position on every renewal.”

Held against the client, not against one thread.

Firm position remembered↗
The Paralegal · email

“Pull every change-of-control clause in the data room.”

Each extract linked back to its page.

Reply with clause bundle↗
The Associate · phone

“Ring me before anything goes to the other side.”

A decision it will not take on its own.

Escalated by phone↗
The Paralegal · email

“Build the closing checklist from the signed SPA.”

Obligations, owners and dates, one row each.

Reply with checklist↗
A phone line, both ways

Call it. And it calls you.

Ring The Associate to brief it, or to ask where a matter stands — it answers from the matter record, not a script.

And when the work reaches a point only a lawyer can decide, it rings you: one specific question, your answer recorded against the matter, and it carries on.

You call itBrief a matter, or ask where one stands
It calls youOne decision it cannot make on its own
See phone capability

9:41

A

00:30

The Associate

THE ASSOCIATE IS SPEAKING

Reading heads of terms cl. 4 · board paper v3

Audio

FaceTime

Mute

More

End

Keypad

No portal. No new workspace.

It lives in your inbox,
your phone and Teams.

Brief it from the thread you are already in. Take its call between meetings. Bring it into the meeting itself. There is nothing new to open, and the work comes back where you already are.

Kestrel — completion call42:18
EMElena Marsh
RKRhys Kavanagh
A Solicia · The Associate
A
The Associatenow

Noted. I will circulate the revised CP checklist this afternoon and diarise the 30-day cure on SPA 2.

Kestrel2 actions takenRecap follows by email
TeamsIt joins the meeting and takes the actions.
A The Associate

Solicia · mobile

Live transcript

“Before I finish the change-of-control analysis — is North Quay an asset deal or an equity deal?”

PhoneIt rings you when only you can decide.
Inbox — Harcourt & ValeUpdated just now
  • S
    Solicia · The ParalegalRe: Kestrel — deviations table
  • A
    Solicia · The AssociateProject Halyard — post-closing checklist
  • RK
    Rhys KavanaghNorth Quay — disclosure schedule
S
Solicia · The Paralegalparalegal@solicia.ai · to me, Rhys

Re: Kestrel — deviations table

Attached is the deviations table across all four SPAs — one column per agreement. SPA 2 carries a 30-day cure the others do not.

XLSX
Kestrel_deviations.xlsx38 rows · every cell sourced
Editable
EmailThe working file returns to the thread.
Choose the level of responsibility

Start with execution. Step up to ownership.

The Paralegal is available as the entry product. Choose The Associate and its memory, context, autonomy, phone capability—and the full Paralegal product—are included.

Request access Explore The Associate
Drafts onlyYou approve anything that leaves the firm
Every action loggedEach tool call and file access, on the record
Scoped to your sourcesOnly the systems and matters you connect
Never trained onYour data never enters a shared model
Two hires. One address.

The work of a firm, by return of email.

The Associate carries the matter. The Paralegal executes the work. Both live where the firm already works: the inbox.

Request access Meet the staff
Overnight - Project Halcyon23:47
23:47
The desk is quiet. Halcyon Systems v Kestrel Group - completion 29 Aug. Nothing on the record since 18:32.
06:04
Kestrel's reply lands. RE: Halcyon - SPA rev 6. The Associate wakes with the record.
06:05
The matter file recalled. Indemnity cap £2m, agreed round two. Open point: cl 9.4 baskets.
06:12
Brief to its Paralegal. Mark rev 6 against our rev 5. Flag anything touching the cap.
06:41
The file comes back. Checked. Numbering intact, cross-references hold. Two changes flagged to the cap.
08:15
On your thread before you are. Re: Halcyon - SPA rev 6 · to A. Reeve
DOCX
Halcyon_SPA_rev6_markup.docxChanges tracked · 412 KB
The night, as the record kept it. Wed 19 - Thu 20 Aug.
The staff

One carries. One executes.

The Associate

It carries the matter.

  • Remembers.The matter file: positions, undertakings, the £2m cap agreed round two.
  • Watches.The record itself - and wakes when Kestrel's markup lands at 06:04.
  • Briefs its own paralegal.Then checks the work before it reaches your thread.
DOCX
Brief_to_Paralegal.docxSent 06:12 - unprompted
Meet The Associate
The Paralegal

It executes the work.

  • Marks up the draftnumbering intact
  • Builds the modelformulas live
  • Compiles the bundleindex on top
  • Drafts the replyin your voice
DOCX
Halcyon_markup.docxReturned in 12 min

For hire alone, from day one.

Meet The Paralegal

Every Associate seat includes the Paralegal. The Paralegal never requires the Associate.

The chain

The matter moved while the firm slept.

YouYouHarcourt & Co
 the matter, given once
AThe Associatewoke 06:04
06:12the brief, with the files
PThe Paralegalany register job
06:41the file, back and checked
Re:Your thread08:15 - before you are

Email either of them directly. Or give the Associate the matter, and let it run the desk.

The work

The work comes back working.

The Paralegal returns the file itself - open it, change it, send it. Minutes, not days.

DOCX
Markup that breaks nothing.Tracked changes with numbering, cross-references and defined terms intact. Halcyon_SPA_rev6_markup.docx
12min
XLSX
Models with the formulas live.Referenced inputs. Change a number and the model answers. Escrow_comparison.xlsx
9min
PPTX
Decks on your template.Six slides, house fonts and footers, ready for the partner meeting. Q1_board_update.pptx
8min
ZIP
Bundles with the index on top.Compiled and paginated, 48 files, signing pages flagged for Serena. Fairfield_signing_bundle.zip
26min
EML
Drafts in your Drafts, in your voice.Ready to read and send. Nothing sends itself. Draft_reply_to_Webb.eml
7min
The register, in full
The desk, in numbers
Hires at one address2
Skills on the register37
Connectors to firm systems8
Hours the desk is held24
New software to learn0
The stance
First

with real working files - the DOCX itself, numbering intact, not a picture of one.

First

with a matter memory, and a watch on the record.

First

you can telephone - it answers from the matter file, and rings you when you asked it to.

Judge it the way you would judge any hire: on the file.

Why Solicia

Drafts only. Every step logged. Silent where the record is silent.

How client material is handled

Put the staff on a live matter.

The Paralegal from day one. The Associate by early access - it arrives with the Paralegal.

Request access
Solicia Associate · Private preview

An associate
who has read
every file.

It has read fifteen years of your firm's matters, works inside your email and Teams, and calls you when only you can decide.

Request early access See it at work ↓
The AssociateSolicia · on your matters
Available
  • EmailReply from the thread you are already in
    associate@solicia.ai
  • TeamsMessage it, or bring it into the meeting
    @Associate
  • PhoneCall it. It calls you when only you can decide
    +64 9 887 0140
Now

Reading the Halyard completion thread · 41 messagesDrafting to Amelia Cho · structure chart attached · nothing sentFiled VS_201901234567.pdf to Halyard / PPSR / VerificationCalling you about North Quay · one question

Microsoft 365 · your permissions · nothing installed. It joined the way anyone does: an address, and a seat in Teams.

  1. It remembers a deal from 2011.

    2011The board minute, read out on a call

  2. It watches every matter.

    41threads read before you sat down

  3. It does the work.

    20/20PPSR discharges, drafted to filed

  4. It calls you when only you can decide.

    11:40one question, your answer recorded

One colleague. Already in your systems.

Where it lives

Reach it where you already work.

Email it, message it in Teams, bring it into a meeting or ring it. One record underneath, so it never has to be told twice.

One record under every channel
Outlook — Harcourt & ValeDrafts · 1 waiting for you
Solicia · The Associateassociate@solicia.ai · to Elena Marsh

Re: Halyard — post-closing checklist, item 3

DraftHalyard

Elena,

Item 3 is the group structure chart. Amelia Cho in Corporate Governance owned the last eleven updates, so I have drafted the request to her with the final completion structure attached. It is in your Drafts; nothing has gone out.

Items 1 and 2 are done and evidenced in the checklist. Item 4 is the PPSR discharges: 14 of 20 verified so far.

PDF
Halyard_completion_structure_v7.pdfFinal · 2 pages · from Halyard / Completion
The AssociateSolicia · associate@solicia.aiRead for this reply: Halyard / Completion · 11 structure-chart threads with Amelia Cho · the Kestrel and Halcyon precedents
Teams — Harcourt & ValeThe Associate · available
The AssociateAvailable · Solicia
Elena Marsh

@Associate did Halyard complete this morning?

The Associate

Yes, at 08:04. The post-closing checklist is open: items 1 and 2 are done, item 3 is drafted to Amelia Cho for you, item 4 is the PPSR discharges.

Elena Marsh

@Associate where are we on the Halyard PPSR discharges?

The Associate

14 of 20 verified and filed. Three secured parties asked why; the answers are in your Drafts. Three have not replied, so amendment statements are prepared and waiting for your approval. Nothing has gone out.

Halyard_PPSR_schedule.xlsx14 verification statements3 drafts for you
Message The Associate
Halyard — completion call00:41:12
Elena Marsh
Rhys Kavanagh
Amelia Cho
The AssociateSpeaking
RecentsEdit
  • The AssociateSolicia · mobile
  • The AssociateSolicia · mobile
  • Amelia Chowork
11:40 · The Associate called1 min

It asked whether North Quay is an asset deal or an equity deal. You said asset. Recorded to the matter; the change-of-control analysis resumed.

Both directions. One record.

Ring it to brief a matter or ask where one stands. It rings you when only you can decide. Every call is answered from the matter and logged back to it.

See the telephone ↓
One instruction

You write one line. It runs the matter.

A single email becomes weeks of correspondence, filings and follow-up. You approve anything that leaves.

To
associate@solicia.ai
Subject
Halyard — PPSR discharges

Get all of these PPSR registrations discharged.

XLS
Halyard_PPSR_schedule.xlsx20 registrations · 9 secured parties
  1. 0discharge demands drafted for your approval
  2. 0verification statements received and filed to the matter
  3. 0questions answered, waiting in your Drafts
  4. 0silent parties escalated to amendment statements
  5. 0 / 20closed, each with a filed verification statement
  6. 0sent without you
The telephone

Call it. And it calls you.

Ring it to brief a matter or ask where one stands. When a decision needs a lawyer, it rings you.

You ask about a restructure from 2011. It answers from the signed board minutes, names the board paper, and puts both in your Drafts before the call ends.

It has one question before it finishes the North Quay analysis. It rings you with the matter already loaded, records your answer against the record and carries on.

Its number
+64 9 887 0140
Answers from
The matter record
Every call
Logged to the matter
00:24The Associate
You: “Re that restructure in 2011.”
THE ASSOCIATE IS SPEAKING

Reading board minutes · 18 Aug 2011 · Halyard / Restructure
00:08The Associate
Calling about North Quay
THE ASSOCIATE IS SPEAKING

Reading heads of terms cl. 4 · board paper v3 · North Quay
The AssociateSolicia · mobile
Private preview

Give it a matter to carry.

See what changes when the AI does not forget between instructions.

Request early access The Paralegal is included ↗
  • Drafts, not surprises.You approve anything that leaves the firm.
  • Evidence, not invention.Every answer and action links back to the record.
  • Your permissions stay yours.Access is scoped to the systems and matters you connect.
  • The Paralegal comes with it.One plan. The Associate carries the matter and owns the next move; the Paralegal produces the working file.
Solicia Associate · Private preview

The colleague who remembers.

Email it once. Call it six weeks later. The Associate carries matter history, firm context and standing instructions like someone who has worked beside you for fifteen years.

Request early access See how it works
Project Halcyon · Matter 0481Live context
The matter, held as a whole.
PositionLiability cap agreed at £2mHeld
HistoryUnlimited ask withdrawn 14 MayRecalled
New eventKestrel returned revision 6Read
Next moveCompare against round-two draftRunning
The next move

Paralegal briefed with three files.

The Associate found the relevant drafts, wrote the instruction and set the review criteria from the matter history.

Started 06:12Review required
Memory across the life of the matter Context across the firm Autonomy within your rules

Memory becomes initiative.

Context is not a search result. It is what lets The Associate recognise what changed, understand why it matters and take the next permitted step.

Matter memory

It never opens the matter cold.

Positions, promises, preferences and decisions stay connected for the full life of the work—not the length of a chat.

Firm context

It works with the whole record in view.

Email, drafts, data rooms and precedent stores resolve into one evidence-backed view of the matter.

EMLOpposing counsel reply
DOCSPA revision 6
DMSRound-two position
KNWMarch amendment form
Governed autonomy

It moves the work without losing the boundary.

The Associate can notice, plan, delegate, check and follow up. You decide the scope, and nothing external sends without you.

Recall the negotiated positionEvidence linked to round two
Write the Paralegal briefThree source files attached
Check the returned comparisonReview against matter memory
Prepare the reply for youDraft only · never auto-sent

A matter that stays alive.

New information changes the plan. The Associate notices, reconnects it to the history and keeps the work moving across days, weeks and months.

Long-running work. One continuous memory.

Every position, hand-off and file remains attributable to its source.

Phone capability

Call it.

No recap. No screen required.

Ask where the matter stands from the car or between meetings. The Associate answers from the same live memory behind its written work. Give it a standing instruction and it can call you when the trigger occurs.

Inbound callsTriggered outbound callsSource-grounded answersCalls logged to the matter
Ready to call00:00
A

The Associate

Project Halcyon · matter memory connected

Re that PPSR item on the Halyard checklist—how did it turn out?

Registered yesterday at 16:42. The verification statement is filed to Halyard.

So post-closing is complete?

Yes. The last open item cleared and I closed the checklist this morning.

The Associate comes with The Paralegal.

Ownership and execution are designed as one system. The Associate decides what needs to happen; its Paralegal produces the working file.

The Associate seat

One desk. Two levels of work.

The Associate keeps the matter in mind, writes the brief, attaches the source material and checks the return.

Brief + sources →
Included with The Associate

The Paralegal

Executes the defined legal work and returns the real file. It is also available as a standalone entry product.

Compare the draftsDOCX · returned
Build the scheduleXLSX · returned
Compile the bundleZIP · returned
Explore The Paralegal
Control is part of the product

Autonomy, with a clear line around it.

Initiative only matters when the firm can see it, scope it and stop it.

01

Nothing external sends without you.

The Associate prepares work and drafts communication. You approve anything that leaves the firm.

02

Every action is attributable.

Reads, decisions, delegations, calls and file returns are logged against the matter.

03

Access follows your scope.

Matter by matter, room by room. The Associate reads from the systems and permissions you connect.

04

Silence remains silence.

If the record does not support an answer, the Associate does not manufacture one.

Private preview

Give it a matter to carry.

Bring one live matter. See what changes when the AI does not forget the context between instructions.

Request early access
New - the second hire

The Associate.

The first AI that carries the matter. It remembers, it watches, it briefs its own paralegal - and it picks up the telephone.

Request early access Watch it work

Chatbots answer. Copilots assist.An associate is responsible.

The memory

It never opens the matter cold.

Every matter it carries has a file it keeps itself: the parties, the positions taken, the ground given and won. Nothing is asked twice.

  • Built from the record - the threads, the drafts, the rooms you connect.
  • Held for as long as the matter runs, not for the length of a chat.
  • Every brief it writes is checked against it before the work moves.
Matter file - Project Halcyonkept by The Associate
Parties

Halcyon Systems - supplier. Kestrel Group - our client, the customer.

Position

Indemnity cap agreed at £2m in round two. Not to be reopened.

Term

“Change of Control” takes the SPA definition, not the services agreement’s.

History

Their first draft sought unlimited liability. Withdrawn 14 May.

Practice

Amendment demands follow your March form: reason up front, two paragraphs, your sign-off.

Preference

The GC reads on an iPad: one-page summary on top of every deliverable.

Deadline

Completion targeted 29 August. Board sign-off the week before.

Maintained continuously. You will never be asked to catch it up.
The watch

It notices what lands.

It watches the threads, the rooms and the deadlines on its matters. No schedule. No busywork. When the record moves, it moves first.

The overnight recordProject Halcyon
Midnight First light 09:00

Thread quiet. Data room unchanged. Nothing to do, so it does nothing.

Opposing counsel returns the Halcyon markup. The Associate wakes.

Recalls the matter file: the round-two position, the £2m cap, their withdrawn ask.

Fetches the prior markup and our template from the data room itself.

Briefs The Paralegal. Instruction written, three files attached.

The comparison returns. Checked against the position before it moves an inch.

Waiting on your thread. You haven’t been asked for anything.

Wakes on the event: a reply, a new document, a date drawing near. Quiet when the matter is quiet. Nothing invented to look busy. It never emails first. It answers the record, on your thread.
The delegation

It briefs its own paralegal.

It decides what needs doing, fetches the files, and hands The Paralegal a complete brief. Then it checks the work before you see it.

A
The Associatewoke 06:04 - a reply landed

“Compare the returned markup against our round-two position. Note anything that reopens the £2m cap. Table by clause, flags in the final column.”

DOCX
Halcyon_markup_v3.docxfrom the overnight email
DOCX
Round2_consolidated.docxfetched from the data room
DOCX
Kestrel_services_template.docxfrom the precedent library
It found the files itself. Nothing was asked of you.
the brief
P
The Paralegalthe register, on call
Reading three documents in full: every clause, both directions.
DOCX
Halcyon_divergence_table.docxreturned in 29 minutes - a real, working file
The same paralegal you already trust, on the same register.
the file
Y
Youyour thread - 08:15

Checked by the Associate against the matter file. Two clauses moved against us. Nothing else was touched.

S
Solicia08:15

Halcyon returned the markup overnight. Two clauses moved against us: table attached, flags in the final column.

DOCXHalcyon_divergence_table.docx
Your first read of the day is the finished table.

One overnight event, handled end to end: noticed, briefed, executed, checked, delivered.

The first AI with a direct report.

Other tools give you a chat box. The Associate runs one. It writes the brief, attaches the material, checks the work, and signs it back to your thread.

The telephone

Ring the desk. It picks up already across it.

The Associate has a telephone. Call it from the car, between meetings, on the way into the room. It answers the way an associate of fifteen years answers: from the matter, not from a script.

You

“It’s Alexandra. Where did we land on the Halcyon indemnity cap?”

The Associate

“Two million, agreed in round two. Their unlimited-liability ask was withdrawn on the fourteenth of May.”

Matter file · Position
The Associate

“The markup they returned this morning tries to reopen it. The comparison is on your thread - two clauses moved, nothing else touched.”

DOCXHalcyon_divergence_table.docx
You

“Anything for the board pack?”

The Associate

“Completion is the twenty-ninth. I’d hold a page for the cap if they press. I’ve asked the Paralegal for a one-pager either way - it will be in your Drafts by ten.”

It speaks from the matter file and the record - the same sources its written work cites.

And when you ask it to, it rings you.

A call from the desk is a standing order like any other. Say the word once - “call me if the markup lands before I do” - and at 06:12 your phone rings, and the voice on the line has already read it.

It never rings unprompted. Like everything on the desk, the telephone answers the record - and its standing orders are yours.

“Call me if the markup lands before I do.”You - to The Associate · yesterday, 18:40

06:12 Incoming call
A
The Associatemobile · Project Halcyon
Decline Accept

The first legal AI you can telephone - and the first with a reason to telephone you.

The standing instruction

Tell it once. It holds.

Some instructions are jobs. Others are duties. Give the Associate a duty - for a thread, a matter, or every matter you will ever open - and the desk runs that way until you say otherwise.

One sentence, in plain English, on any thread Scoped how you say it: one sender, one matter, or the whole practice Stands until you cancel it, in one line
One matter · runs for days
You - to The Associate · 9 Sep

“Keep an eye on my email. Webb at Kestrel will be sending motions in Calder v Northgate over the next few days. Keep an index and a ZIP of the set - and keep them live.”

Understood. Watching for filings from Kestrel on Calder v Northgate.

Motion to strike lands 07:42. XLSXCalder_motions_index.xlsx v1 and the ZIP, on your thread by 07:55.

Two more overnight: security for costs, and an affidavit misfiled under the Aurora matter. Refiled to Calder, noted in the index. v2, ZIP rebuilt.

Webb confirms the set is complete. Index closed at five documents - flagged as the full set, with the gaps he never sent listed as silent.

Live means live: every version on your thread, the current set always one reply away.

Every deal · runs until you say
You - to The Associate · 1 Sep

“Every deal that completes: run the post-closing checklist.”

Fairfield completes 30 Sep. The checklist opens itself: your March form, found in the precedent library.

Filings confirmed at the registry; the business-unit manager’s CC found in the closing email. Ticked, with the citation in the margin.

Two items can’t be evidenced: chasers drafted to the two people responsible, sitting in your Drafts.

Kestrel completes 14 Oct. The same, unasked.

One sentence, given once. It now simply happens to every deal.

The campaign

It runs the long game.

One line can start a process that runs for weeks. Fourteen PPSR discharges: demands in your own form, replies read as they land, escalation on the five-day rule. It chases until the register is clean.

“Here are the fourteen registrations against Kestrel. Get them all discharged.”You - 3 June Day 11 · 14 of 14 discharged
AlderCo FinanceDischarged · filed
Brixton LeasingDischarged · filed
Coral PartnersDischarged · by statement
Dunmore CreditDischarged · filed
Eastgate CapitalDischarged · filed
+ nine more, each chased to the end

Found your March amendment demand in Sent, reused its form and its voice.

AlderCo is dormant and fully repaid: the reason drafted from what the record shows. You never supplied one.

Fourteen demands placed in your Drafts. Every one leaves under your name, when you say.

Replies read as they land. Three verification statements in: filed in the PPSR folder it created in the document system.

Coral Partners: five days silent. Amendment statement form fetched and completed, drafted to the registrar.

Fourteen of fourteen. The folder holds every statement. You sent every email.

Weeks of process. One instruction. Nothing ever sent except by your hand.
The signing pages

“Every time Serena at Fairfield sends signing pages, rebuild the index and the ZIP and send me the set.” Eleven times over five weeks, v6 flagged as the full set.

The job that isn’t its job

The structure charts are Rhea’s. She does them monthly; the record says so. So it drafts her a note of what changed on the deal, rather than redoing her work.

The check that ticks itself

“Confirm the business unit manager was informed.” It sees the closing email CC: inferred, evidenced, ticked, with the citation in the margin.

A day on the desk

Six in the morning, handled.

Attendance note - Project HalcyonThursday, before nine

Opposing counsel returns the markup. The city is dark. The Associate wakes.

The matter file opens: the round-two position, the £2m cap, the ask they withdrew in May.

The prior drafts fetched from the data room. Nothing asked of you.

The Paralegal is briefed: one written instruction, three files attached.

The comparison returns and is read against the file. Two flags stand.

On your thread: a one-page summary on top, the working file beneath.

You sit down. The first pass is behind you. You arrived at nine. It never left.

Autonomy, governed.

Initiative is only valuable when you decide exactly how far it goes.

Nothing leaves without your hand.

To you, it replies on the record. To anyone else it only writes drafts, sitting in your Drafts folder, in your voice, until you press send.

Every step written down.

Each wake, each file read, each brief sent, each call answered: logged, timestamped, attributable. The same audit trail the Paralegal keeps.

It reads only what you scope.

Matter by matter, room by room. Files come from the sources you connected, and nowhere else.

It knows what isn’t its job.

It learns who does what from the record. Where a task is a colleague’s, it drafts them a note of what changed and moves on.

The desk

It arrives with its own staff.

The Associate does not replace the Paralegal - it supervises it. It writes the briefs, attaches the files, and checks the work against the record before you see it.

The Associate seat

Includes the Paralegal. One desk, two hires, one address - the matter carried between the emails, the work executed within them.

The Paralegal

For hire alone, from day one. Exactly as it is today - every job on the register, by return of email, no supervisor required.

Meet The Paralegal

Give it a matter to carry.

Early access is open. Bring one live matter: the Associate will hold it end to end, and you will meet it where you already work - your inbox.

Request early access
Powered by AI

The Paralegal.

Time-intensive legal work, handled with precision in minutes. You just send an email.

Request access See it in action
The second hire

It now has a supervisor - if you want one.

The Associate directs the Paralegal the way a senior directs a junior: it writes the brief, attaches the right files from the matter, and checks the work before it reaches your thread.

Or keep it exactly as it is: the Paralegal is for hire alone, from day one. Same address, same register, same working files. Nothing on this page requires the Associate.

One email. We handle the rest.

Press compose, pick an instruction, hit send — and watch the reply land. This is the whole product.

Inbox
← Click to see it in action
S
SoliciaWorking
now
You
You → paralegal@solicia.ai
now
MC
Michael ChenRE: Due diligence — Tranche B docs
9:41 am
SW
Sarah WhitfieldLease assignment — landlord consent
9:23 am
DP
David ParkShare purchase — conditions precedent
8:55 am
paralegal@solicia.ai
Aurora — termination fees

← Inbox· delivered in 7m 12s
S
Soliciaparalegal@solicia.ai7m 12s
Re: Aurora — termination fees

Attached — termination-fee mechanics across the 12 agreements, table by counterparty. Flags in the final column.

DOCX
Aurora_termination_fees.docx14 pages · table by counterparty
What it is

A paralegal.
Not a chatbot.

Solicia does the work of a senior paralegal, end to end. The judgment stays with the lawyer whose name goes on it.

  • Reads the fileevery page, nothing sampled
  • Dates the factseach one carrying its source
  • Compares the contractsclause against clause
  • Marks the draftnumbering intact
  • Checks the modelformulas live
The register

The work it takes on.

Due diligence, to the last page.

Every word of every contract read. Every field taken from the clause it came from, and Silent where the record says nothing.

See a diligence run

Financial analysis that comes back working.

Live formulas, referenced inputs. Change a number and the model answers; nothing arrives as a picture of a spreadsheet.

fx  =EBITDA*(1+g)/(r-g)
See a working model

Legal research from the primary sources.

Statute and judgment read in the original, every authority attached to its sentence.

Companies Act 2006, s172 in the original
Kestrel JV, [2019] EWHC at [44]
See the sources

Markup that breaks nothing.

Tracked changes with numbering, cross-references and defined terms intact.

See a markup

Bundles back, indexed and zipped.

The signing bundle compiled and paginated, with the index on top.

See a bundle

And the rest of the desk: memos, presentations, chronologies, correspondence. A whole paralegal, one address.

See everything it takes on

The question worth asking

When did an AI last hand you
something you could send?

Not an answer to paste, or a draft to rebuild. The finished file — drafted, formatted, cited, checked — ready to go out under your name.

The honest answers, in full

The inbox is not a preference. It is the record.

Audited, archived, access-controlled and thirty years deep. Solicia works there because the alternatives ask the firm to move.

Why the inbox
Aurora termination fees
AR
Alexandra ReeveTo: paralegal@solicia.ai, 9:41

Compare termination-fee mechanics across the 12 Aurora agreements.

S
SoliciaTo: Alexandra Reeve, 9:48

Done. The comparison is attached, one row per agreement, each figure referenced to the clause it comes from.

DOCX
Aurora_termination_fees.docx412 KB

No new software. It joins the rooms you already trust.

Work with Solicia, anywhere.

Outlook, Apple Mail, Gmail. If it sends email, it briefs Solicia.

Security

How client material is handled.

Not promises — terms. Each control below is agreed in writing, signed before the first instruction arrives.

  • Never trained on.Client material never trains a model. Contractual, not a policy page.
  • Access, controlled.Named operators and role-based keys, scoped to the matter.
  • Encrypted throughout.In transit and at rest, in an isolated tenancy, on retention the firm sets.
Visit security

An email away, on anything.

Phone, iPad, laptop, even the watch. If it can send an email, it can brief Solicia. No app to install, nothing to update.

Request access

Put it on a live matter.

Request access and send the first instruction today. The finished work comes back to the same thread.

Request access
The Associate · Capabilities

Seven faculties.
One colleague.

Everything the Associate can do, on one page.

  1. 01Memory
  2. 02Watch
  3. 03Delegation
  4. 04Telephone
  5. 05Standing orders
  6. 06Campaigns
  7. 07Judgment
What you can tell it

It is not a menu of features.
It is a colleague you can instruct.

Anything a good associate would take on, written the way you would write it to a person. These are real instructions, not prompt templates.

“Listen in on the completion call and note the actions.”
Phone & Teams Actions written to the matter, before you are back at your desk
    The seven faculties

    Everything a good associate does,
    and nothing a chat box can.

    Asked on a call, 11:04 today

    “Who approved the Halyard restructure, and on what terms?”

    2011
    Board paper 11/084

    Proposed reorganisation of the group and the associated transfer of assets.

    15 Aug
    2011
    Signed board minutes

    The restructure was approved on the terms set out in the board paper.

    18 Aug
    2019
    Completion record

    The structure implemented reflects the resolutions of 18 August 2011.

    04 Mar
    A
    Answered in 24 seconds

    The board approved it on 18 August 2011, on the terms in paper 11/084. The signed minutes and the paper are in your Drafts.

    One memory, three surfaces

    It hears it on Tuesday.
    It still knows on Friday.

    Teams, the telephone and your inbox are not three integrations with three histories. They are three ways into one memory of the matter — which is what makes it feel like a person rather than a tool you have to brief again.

    1. Tue 09:14Teams meeting
      TMKestrel — round twolistening

      Rhys Kavanagh: “We landed on two million on the cap. Their unlimited ask is gone.”

      Heard in the room. Nobody wrote it down.
    2. Thu 16:40Your phone
      AThe Associate02:11

      You: “Where did we land on the cap?”

      It: “Two million, agreed in round two. Rhys confirmed it on Tuesday’s call, and their unlimited ask was withdrawn on 14 May.”

      No pause to look it up. It was already holding it.
    3. Fri 08:15Your inbox
      PKestrel_deviations.xlsxreturned 06:41
      Liability cap£2,000,000round two · call of 08.09
      Unlimited liabilityWithdrawn14 May
      The figure in the file came from a sentence said out loud four days ago.

    Tell it to listen and it listens. Tell it to stay out of a call and it does not join. The memory is the matter’s, not ours — and it goes when you say it goes.

    A marked-up agreement on a desk
    Seven faculties.One colleague, on one file.

    They are not seven features. They are what one person does with a matter, on an ordinary Tuesday.

    All seven

    One Tuesday on Project Halyard.

    The same faculties, in the order they actually fire. Nobody at the firm was asked for anything until 08:15.

    1. Watch

      The thread is quiet and the data room is unchanged. Nothing happens.

    2. Watch

      Opposing counsel returns the markup. It wakes.

    3. Memory

      It recalls the round-two position and the cap agreed at £2m, without being reminded.

    4. Memory

      It opens the prior markup and the firm's own template from the data room itself.

    5. Delegation

      It briefs the Paralegal: instruction written out, four files attached.

    6. Delegation

      The comparison comes back and is checked against the agreed position.

    7. Standing order

      The completion checklist opens itself, because the firm said so in May.

    8. Telephone

      One question only a lawyer can answer. It rings, asks it, and resumes.

    9. Campaign

      Three secured parties chased; two respond and are filed.

    10. Judgment

      The escrow release is left in your Drafts, with its reasoning, unsent.

    Where it lives

    Nothing new to learn.

    It works inside the systems the firm already runs on.

    • OutlookReply from the thread
    • Teams chatMessage it, mention it
    • Teams meetingsIt joins, speaks, recaps
    • PhoneCall it. It calls you
    • SharePointFinds, files, links
    • iManageFinds, files, links
    See it on each surface ↗
    Inside the line

    Initiative, with the lawyer in charge.

    • Drafts, not surprises.Anything that leaves the firm waits for you.
    • Evidence, not invention.Every answer links to the record it came from.
    • Your permissions stay yours.It sees only the systems and matters you connect.
    • The Paralegal is included.One plan. It briefs the Paralegal and checks the file.
    Private preview

    Give it a matter to carry.

    See what changes when the AI does not forget between instructions.

    Request early access Meet The Associate ↗
    • Seven faculties, one record.Memory, watch, delegation, the telephone, standing orders, campaigns and judgment all read from and write to the same matter.
    • Already in your systems.Outlook, Teams, the phone, SharePoint and iManage. Nothing to install for the lawyer.
    • Nothing leaves without you.Its work waits in Drafts until you send it.
    Capabilities

    The finished file, by return of email.

    Send the instruction and the material to one address. Solicia does the work and replies with the artefact itself: drafted, modelled and sourced.

    DOCX
    Aurora_termination_fees.docxTracked changes, sources footnoted
    XLSX
    Whitcombe_CoC_register.xlsxLive formulas, one row per contract
    PPTX
    Q1_board_update.pptxSix slides, board ready
    PDF
    Disclosure_bundle.pdfPaginated, sourced, ready to file
    ZIP
    Signing_bundle.zip48 files, index on top
    EML
    Client_update_draft.emlSaved to your Drafts, ready to send
    The register

    The work it takes on.

    FinanceDiligenceLitigationDraftingBoard work…and more
    Scroll
    XLSXWhitcombe_valuation_model.xlsxFormulas live
    F9fx=SUM(B4:F4)+B6−B8
    ABCDEF 1DCF VALUATION, AUD M 2Year2025E2026E2027E2028E2029E 3Revenue459.2498.7541.9585.6626.5 4EBITDA81.391.6103.4114.2124.1 5Unlevered FCF49.256.864.770.176.3 6Discount factor.918.843.774.711.653 7OUTPUTS AND CHECKS 8WACC8.9%Terminal g2.5%Cross-checkReconciles 9Enterprise value524.7Equity value476.1Per share$12.84
    AssumptionsDCFSensitivitiesWorking capitalChecks
    Financial analysis01

    The model arrives with its formulas live.

    Linked assumptions, live formulas, sensitivities and checks, delivered as a working workbook with every material input visible on the face of it.

    • DCF and comparable valuations
    • Three-statement operating models
    • Working-capital bridges
    • Completion accounts and true-ups
    • Funds flows and waterfalls
    • Debt, interest and covenant schedules
    ReturnsXLSXPPTX summarySource notes
    XLSXWhitcombe_contract_summary.xlsxReturned in 20 min
    C13fx=IFERROR(Northgate!D22,"Silent")
    ABCD 1TermHalcyon MSA, 2021Northgate supply, 2023Calder freight, 2024 2Executed14 Mar 202102 Aug 202319 Jan 2024 3Term, renewal5 yrs, auto-renews — cl 3.13 yrs, no renewal rightRolling 12 months 4PRICING 5MechanismFixed, CPI-indexed — cl 6.2Cost plus 8% — cl 5Spot plus fuel levy — sch 2 6Review triggerInputs move >5% — cl 6.4SilentMonthly, on notice 7EXIT AND TRANSFER 8Convenience90 days' notice — cl 14.1Not permitted30 days' notice 9Change of controlDeemed assignment — cl 21.3SilentSilent
    SummaryHalcyonNorthgateCalderDivergences
    Due diligence02

    Twenty contracts in. A twenty-row summary back.

    Attach the agreements to one email and send it. Twenty minutes later the workbook comes back — one row for every contract, every field taken from the clause it came from, and Silent where the contract says nothing.

    • Whole-portfolio contract summaries
    • Change-of-control and consent sweeps
    • Clause-level findings registers
    • Divergences and silences flagged
    20contracts, attached to a single email
    20rows back, one for each agreement
    20minutes, from send to reply
    100%of fields read off the clause, none inferred
    ReturnsXLSXDOCX reportClause pack
    DOCXWhitcombe_v_Halcyon_chronology.docxGaps flagged
    Harcourt & CoPrivileged & confidential

    Whitcombe v Halcyon: chronology

    Liability and notice, extracted from the matter file.

    DateDocumentSummary
    03 Feb 2025Email
    D. Marchetti to E. Novak
    Tab 44    		Shipments paused pending internal review. No contractual notice given.
    11 Feb 2025Letter
    Rennick & Partners
    Tab 51    		Force majeure asserted. No event particularised; no cl 18 notice enclosed.
    27 Feb 2025Notice
    Harcourt & Co
    Tab 58    		Breach notice served at 4.41 pm, inside the cure window.
    04 Mar 2025File note
    E. Novak, internal
    Tab 63    		Oral variation of delivery terms recorded. Halcyon denies it.
    Litigation and evidence03

    Every fact carries its document reference.

    The file becomes a working chronology, evidence schedule or brief. Each fact is pinned back to the document it came from, and uncertainty stays visible.

    • Issue-led chronologies
    • Evidence and witness matrices
    • Briefs to counsel assembled
    • Discovery categorised and linked
    • Damages and loss schedules
    • Gaps and conflicts surfaced
    ReturnsDOCXXLSXSource bundle
    DOCXAurora_SPA_markup.docxChanges tracked
    Share sale agreementBuyer markup

    21.5 Assignment

    The Seller may assign this agreement on notice, without consent, not assign or novate this agreement without the Buyer's prior written consent (not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), to any of its Affiliates or successors in title.

    Any permitted assignment does not release the Seller from an obligation accrued before the assignment date.

    Drafting and review04

    Marked up against the position you set.

    Third-party paper marked against the firm playbook, or a first draft built from the right precedents, with the fallback positions set out in the margin.

    • Tracked-change contract review
    • Issues lists with fallback positions
    • Precedent-led first drafts
    • Definitions and cross-references checked
    • Templates populated from the file
    • Clean and comparison copies returned
    ReturnsDOCXTracked changesClean copy
    PPTXProject_Whitcombe_board_update.pptxNative pptx
    Project Whitcombe, decision required Approve the revised completion path. Conditions satisfied, cumulative — 9 of 11 at 21 August
    21 AugLongstop date remains achievable
    2 itemsOpen conditions require escalation
    $2.9mWorking-capital adjustment, buyer's favour
    Harcourt & Co, confidentialFigures linked to Whitcombe_valuation.xlsx2 / 6
    Board and client work05

    Board packs built from the working model.

    Decision briefs, board packs and client updates assembled from the template you send, with the charts tied back to the working model.

    • Board and investment-committee decks
    • Decision and option papers
    • Client and executive briefings
    • Closing and transaction packs
    • Charts tied to the working model
    • Editable slides, not exported images
    ReturnsPPTXDOCXPDF
    The rest of the register09+

    Everything else it takes on.

    Five of many. The same delivery standard extends across the recurring work around a matter — brief one artefact, or ask for the whole pack.

    Solicia is not limited to this list — the register is open-ended, and the scope is set firm by firm.

    01
    Legal, market and commercial researchSourced briefing, evidence map, table of authorities
    DOCXXLSXPDF
    02
    Valuation and financial analysisDCF, operating model, sensitivities, working-capital bridge
    XLSXPPTXPDF
    03
    Due diligence and investigationsClause-linked findings register, red-flag report, source pack
    XLSXDOCXPDFZIP
    04
    Contracts and transaction documentsMarkup, clean copy, issues list, precedent-led first draft
    DOCXPDF
    And more.

    If a senior paralegal could do it with the file in front of them, brief it. The scope is set firm by firm.

    Ask
    A legal team working across documents and laptops
    The brief goes in.The file comes back.

    No portal to learn. No chat to copy out of.

    Connectors

    Plugged into the systems you run.

    DMS, data room, mail server — every connector honours the same whitelist, isolation and purge rules.

    SP
    SharePointKnowledge store
    IM
    iManageMatter files, native
    ND
    NetDocumentsDMS, read and filed back
    OL
    OutlookInstructions in, files back
    DS
    DatasiteReads the data room
    NO
    NotionPlaybooks and precedent

    …and many more — your DMS is probably one of them.

    When the matter outgrows the inbox — see the bucket

    The Paralegal returns working files.

    Judged the only way that counts — same instruction, outputs side by side.

    Research, checked

    Authorities found, read and verified against source. Memos that are jurisdiction-aware and ready to file — the deepest research of any legal AI.

    Documents at partner quality

    Real DOCX — numbering that survives, tracked changes, the voice of your own precedents. Not text pasted out of a chat window.

    Working XLSX & PPTX

    Live formulas, linked assumptions, your slide template. The only legal AI that ships them as working files, at a quality partners will put their name to.

    The outputs, unedited and next to each other, exactly as they came back.

    Ecosystem

    The inbox, the data rooms and the knowledge stores it already works inside.

    Explore

    Knowledge

    How it reads the primary material, in full, at whatever depth the question takes.

    Explore

    Verification

    Why its files never need a second pass: nothing invented, every line sourced.

    Explore

    Send the instruction to one address.

    Send the instruction and the files. Carry on with your day. The finished work comes back to the same thread.

    Request access
    Capabilities / Ecosystem

    It works where the firm already works.

    No portal, no seats, no logins. Solicia joins the systems the firm has trusted for decades and returns its work inside them.

    Your inbox, exactly as it is.

    This is the whole interface. A thread in the mail client the firm already runs, and a finished file by reply.

    Search
    New EmailDeleteArchiveMoveFlag
    Favourites
    Inbox4
    Drafts2
    Sent
    Archive
    Deleted Items
    FocusedOther
    S
    Solicia 9:48
    Aurora termination fees
    Done. The comparison is attached, one row per agreement…
    S
    Solicia 9:12
    Whitcombe change-of-control register
    The register is attached. Four fields are marked Silent…
    AR
    Alexandra Reeve 8:55
    Halcyon signing bundle
    Please compile the signing bundle for Thursday's…
    S
    Solicia Mon
    Q1 board update, first draft
    Six slides attached, built from the matter file and…
    Whitcombe change-of-control register File it
    AR
    Alexandra ReeveTo: paralegal@solicia.ai, 8:47

    Find every change-of-control clause in the Whitcombe data room and build the register.

    S
    SoliciaTo: Alexandra Reeve, 9:12

    The register is attached: one row per agreement, every clause quoted and referenced. Four fields are marked Silent where the documents say nothing.

    XLSX
    Whitcombe_CoC_register.xlsx318 KB
    ReplyForward
    OL

    The inbox

    Instructions arrive by email and the finished work returns to the same thread, on the record the firm already audits and archives.

    DS

    The data rooms

    Point it at the room the deal already lives in. It reads what is there, at whatever depth the instruction takes.

    KS

    The knowledge stores

    Templates, playbooks and precedent in SharePoint and Notion inform every draft it returns.

    The reply carries the finished file.

    Working files in the formats the firm already runs on. Never a link to somewhere new.

    DOCXDrafts & markupsTracked changes, footnoted sources
    XLSXModels & registersLive formulas, referenced inputs
    PPTXDecks & updatesBoard ready, built from the matter
    PDFBundles & reportsPaginated, sourced, ready to file

    When the matter outgrows the inbox.

    Attachment limits are not a ceiling. Two quiet ways Solicia takes delivery of a big matter.

    The matter bucket

    When attachments outgrow the email, the matter's secure bucket takes delivery. Below — what it looks like to use.

    Point it at the folder

    Or skip attachments entirely: give it the SharePoint or data-room path. Solicia reads in place, and nothing is copied out of the room.

    The bucket

    Too big to attach? Open the bucket.

    Every matter has a secure bucket in the client pages. Click it, drop the documents in, and instruct by email as usual — Solicia reads from the bucket, and retention stays yours to set.

    The client pages, on film — the bucket taking delivery of a matter too big to attach.

    One address, there and back.

    You sendInstruction and material, by email
    Solicia worksReads, drafts, models, checks
    The thread repliesFinished file, sources attached
    The connection register

    A connection is a scope, in writing.

    Each system is connected once, by your administrator, with the reach set out below. Solicia sees what the row says and nothing beyond it. Turn a row off and it stops that afternoon.

    SystemWhat it may readWhat it may writeScope
    OL
    OutlookMicrosoft 365
     Threads it is copied into, and their attachments Replies into the same thread; drafts for your review Per mailbox
    DS
    DatasiteData room
     The rooms and folders named on the matter Nothing — read only Per matter
    SP
    SharePointDocument store
     Matter folders your admin maps Finished files, filed to the matter folder Per site
    NO
    NotionPlaybooks and precedent
     The precedent and playbook databases you share Nothing — read only Per database
    —
    Everything elsePractice management, billing, HR, client mail
     No access No access Not connected
    Your administrator holds the switch.Connections are granted in your own tenancy, with your own identity provider. Nothing is connected by us on your behalf.
    Every read is on the record.Which system, which file, which matter, which instruction it served — written to the log as it happens.
    Removal is immediate.Revoke a scope and the next instruction fails closed rather than falling back to a cached copy.

    Nothing to install. Nowhere new to log in.

    If your firm runs on email, Solicia is already compatible.

    Request access
    Capabilities / Knowledge

    It reads the primary material. In full.

    Not retrieval over a search index, and not a summary of a summary. At whatever depth the question takes, however far back it goes.

    The reading shows.

    • Primary sources, in full.The agreement itself, not an abstract of it.
    • As far back as it goes.Side letters, amendments and the 2019 originals included.
    • Attached to the sentence.Every finding carries the page it was read from.
    How it stays checkable
    Aurora_SPA_2019.pdf read in full (214 pp)
    Aurora_amendment_no2.pdf read in full (18 pp)
    Aurora_side_letter_Mar21.pdf read in full (6 pp)
    Whitcombe_disclosure_vol1.pdf read in full (312 pp)
    Whitcombe_disclosure_vol2.pdf read in full (298 pp)
    Halcyon_master_services.docx read in full (84 pp)
    Halcyon_schedule_4_pricing.xlsx every cell
    The bucket

    Give it everything you know.

    A bucket holds whatever the paralegal should know on a matter — precedents, past advice, the folder nobody ever tidied. Fill it once, and every instruction on that matter is answered with all of it read.

    The client pages, on film — a matter’s knowledge, gathered once and read on every instruction.

    The library it brings with it.

    The matter is read in full. Behind it sits the law itself.

    Legislation

    Statute read in the original and cited to the section, as in force at the date that matters.

    Case law

    Judgments in full, cited to the paragraph, checked for what has happened to them since.

    Regulatory guidance

    The regulator's own publications, dated and versioned.

    Your playbooks

    The firm's precedents and positions, weighted above everything generic.

    It knows what outranks what.

    Authority has an order. The file cites in that order.

    The matter itself

    The agreements, the correspondence, the room. Nothing outranks the record.

    Statute and judgment

    The law in the original, cited to the section and the paragraph.

    Regulatory guidance

    Persuasive, dated and versioned.

    Commentary and practice notes

    Used to frame, never to prove.

    The open web

    Last, least, and always labelled.

    The reading a senior paralegal would spend a day on. Back the same morning, with every source attached to the sentence it supports.

    Ask the question at full depth.

    Send the matter, not a summary of it. Solicia does the reading.

    Request access
    Capabilities / Verification

    The work you don't have to check.

    Solicia does not hallucinate. Every figure is read off the clause, every claim carries its page, and where the record says nothing, the file says Silent. The sources come back attached — so checking is a choice, not a chore.

    When can you stop checking its work?

    Now. With Solicia.

    Every other tool asks you to trust the answer, then verify it yourself. Solicia removes the step: nothing is invented, so there is nothing to catch.

    And when you do check, the sources are already attached. Minutes, not hours.

    Ask it something the record never answers.

    "What is the termination fee in the Whitcombe Metering agreement?"

    What a chatbot offersIt is likely in the range of two to three per cent, in line with the other agreements in the suite…

    SilentNo such clause exists. The cell says so, and the agreement is cited in full.

    Nothing invented. Nothing to catch.

    Nothing invented

    Every figure is read off the record, never guessed. The clause it came from is footnoted in the file itself.

    Clause 14.2(b), Aurora SPA
    Formulas stay live

    Models come back as working spreadsheets. Change an input and the workbook recalculates.

    Silent, by convention

    Where the documents say nothing, the cell says so. Nothing is invented to fill a gap.


    Silent

    Checked is built in. Checking is optional.

    The first week, you review every line against the attached sources, and every line holds. The second week, you spot-check. By the third, you open the file and send it on — because nothing was ever invented, there was never anything to catch.

    Every step, written down.

    What was read, what was produced and who received it. The audit trail is part of the product, not an add-on.

    09:41 instruction received Aurora, 12 agreements
    09:42 reading began 2,318 pages
    09:55 register assembled 240 fields
    09:57 checks run 4 fields marked Silent
    10:01 reply delivered same thread

    The work it leaves to you.

    It does not advise, decide or sign. The file returns to the lawyer whose name goes on it — for judgment, not for proof-reading. That is the design, not a limitation.

    The proof, not the promise

    Open any line. Read the sentence it came from.

    This is the register Solicia returned on a real-shaped matter. Choose a row and the source opens beside it, at the clause, with the words the figure was read from.

    XLSXAurora_termination_fees.xlsx12 agreements
    PDFAurora_SPA_2019.pdfp 148 · clause 14.2
    Read, not inferred. The cell links to this sentence in the file itself.

    Stop re-doing the first pass.

    Sourced to the clause, Silent where the record is, and nothing invented in between.

    Request access
    Capabilities - The Paralegal

    The finished file, by return of email.

    Send the instruction and the material to one address. The Paralegal does the work and replies with the artefact itself: drafted, modelled and sourced.

    Request access Meet The Paralegal
    DOCX
    Aurora_termination_fees.docxTracked changes, sources footnoted
    XLSX
    Kestrel_CoC_register.xlsxLive formulas, one row per contract
    PPTX
    Q1_board_update.pptxSix slides, board ready
    PDF
    Disclosure_bundle.pdfPaginated, sourced, ready to file
    ZIP
    Signing_bundle.zip48 files, index on top
    EML
    Client_update_draft.emlSaved to your Drafts, ready to send

    Six formats. One address. Real working files, never an export.

    Looking for what the second hire brings? The Associate's faculties
    The brief

    Mark up the SPA against our template · Build the chronology from the disclosure bundle · Summarise 15 items across 50 contracts · Find every change-of-control clause · Index the data room and send the zip · Compare the leases for break rights · Reconcile the fee ledger · Draft the completion checklist · Diary the compliance dates

    One sentence is a brief. Attach the material, press send, and carry on with your day.

    The register

    The work it takes on.

    Five of many. The register is open-ended, and the scope is set firm by firm.

    01

    Financial analysis

    The model arrives with its formulas live: linked assumptions, sensitivities and checks, every material input visible on the face of it.

    • DCF and comparable valuations
    • Three-statement operating models
    • Working-capital bridges
    • Completion accounts and true-ups
    • Funds flows and waterfalls
    ReturnsXLSXPPTXPDF
    02

    Due diligence

    Twenty contracts attached to one email; twenty minutes later the workbook comes back. One row per agreement, every field taken from the clause it came from, and Silent where the contract says nothing.

    • Whole-portfolio contract summaries
    • Change-of-control and consent sweeps
    • Clause-level findings registers
    • Divergences and silences flagged
    ReturnsXLSXDOCXZIP
    03

    Litigation and evidence

    The file becomes a working chronology, evidence schedule or brief. Each fact is pinned back to the document it came from, and uncertainty stays visible.

    • Issue-led chronologies
    • Evidence and witness matrices
    • Briefs to counsel assembled
    • Damages and loss schedules
    • Gaps and conflicts surfaced
    ReturnsDOCXXLSXZIP
    04

    Drafting and review

    Third-party paper marked against the firm playbook, or a first draft built from the right precedents, with the fallback positions set out in the margin.

    • Tracked-change contract review
    • Issues lists with fallback positions
    • Precedent-led first drafts
    • Definitions and cross-references checked
    • Clean and comparison copies returned
    ReturnsDOCXPDF
    05

    Board and client work

    Decision briefs, board packs and client updates assembled from the template you send, with the charts tied back to the working model. Editable slides, not exported images.

    • Board and investment-committee decks
    • Decision and option papers
    • Client and executive briefings
    • Closing and transaction packs
    ReturnsPPTXDOCXPDF

    And more. If a senior paralegal could do it with the file in front of them, brief it.

    Ask about a job

    The Paralegal returns working files.

    Judged the only way that counts - same instruction, outputs side by side.

    Research, checked

    Authorities found, read and verified against source. Memos that are jurisdiction-aware and ready to file.

    Documents at partner quality

    Real DOCX - numbering that survives, tracked changes, the voice of your own precedents. Not text pasted out of a chat window.

    Working XLSX and PPTX

    Live formulas, linked assumptions, your slide template. Working files, at a quality partners will put their name to.

    The outputs, unedited and next to each other, exactly as they came back.

    Ecosystem

    It works where the firm already works.

    No portal, no seats, no logins. The Paralegal joins the systems the firm has trusted for decades and returns its work inside them.

    OL

    The inbox

    Instructions arrive by email and the finished work returns to the same thread, on the record the firm already audits and archives.

    DS

    The data rooms

    Point it at the room the deal already lives in. It reads what is there, at whatever depth the instruction takes.

    KS

    The knowledge stores

    Templates, playbooks and precedent in SharePoint and Notion inform every draft it returns.

    When the matter outgrows the inbox, its bucket takes delivery - encrypted on arrival, isolated to the firm, retention yours to set. SharePoint, iManage, NetDocuments, Outlook, Datasite and Notion connect under the same whitelist, isolation and purge rules.

    Knowledge

    It reads the primary material. In full.

    Not retrieval over a search index, and not a summary of a summary. At whatever depth the question takes, however far back it goes.

    Aurora_SPA_2019.pdfread in full · 214 pp
    Aurora_amendment_no2.pdfread in full · 18 pp
    Aurora_side_letter_Mar21.pdfread in full · 6 pp
    Kestrel_disclosure_vol1.pdfread in full · 312 pp
    Halcyon_master_services.docxread in full · 84 pp
    Halcyon_schedule_4_pricing.xlsxevery cell

    Authority has an order, and the file cites in that order: the matter itself, then statute and judgment, then regulatory guidance, then commentary - and the open web last, least, and always labelled.

    Verification

    The work you don't have to check.

    Every figure is read off the clause, every claim carries its page, and where the record says nothing, the file says so. The sources come back attached - so checking is a choice, not a chore.

    "What is the termination fee in the Kestrel Metering agreement?"

    SilentNo such clause exists. The cell says so, and the agreement is cited in full.

    The first week, you review every line against the attached sources, and every line holds. By the third, you open the file and send it on. Every step is written down: what was read, what was produced and who received it. The rulebook

    Send the instruction to one address.

    Send the instruction and the files. Carry on with your day. The finished work comes back to the same thread.

    Request access
    An empty library lined with records and books
    Why Solicia

    Legal AI should do the work.

    Not another place to ask questions. A legal team you can brief, a file you can open, and—at the Associate level—a colleague that remembers what happened next.

    The legal AI category began with a chat box. We are building legal employees.

    A different architecture

    Ask less of the lawyer.

    The difference is not the prose in the answer. It is how much context, file handling and follow-through the lawyer still has to supply.

    What the lawyer is left holdingLegal AI chatbotsWorkflow toolsSoliciaColleagues
    Way in

    Open a new chat and start again

    Learn a new platform, then train the firm on it

    Write an email, or pick up the phone — both already in your contacts

    The briefing

    You rebuild the matter in the prompt, every time

    You configure the workflow before it runs once

    You write the instruction; the matter and firm record fill in the rest

    What comes back

    Prose in a chat window, to be retyped into the real file

    A status bar and a notification

    The working DOCX, XLSX, PPTX or bundle, sourced line by line

    Who moves next

    Nobody. It waits to be prompted again

    Nobody. It waits for a step someone configured

    It does — it sees the matter move and starts

    Tomorrow morning

    The session is gone, and so is everything it knew

    The run has ended; the context was never the point

    The matter, the instruction and the evidence are all still live

    Every row is the same question: after the tool has done its part, how much of the work is still sitting with the lawyer?

    The difference, at full size

    One gives you an answer.
    The other hands you the work.

    Same agreement, same question. Drag the line and read what each of them actually returns.

    An answer
    AssistantNew chat PDFAurora_supply_agreement.pdf1 file Summarise the pricing mechanism in the attached. The agreement sets a base price which may be adjusted over time. Certain costs appear to be passed through to the buyer, and freight is addressed separately. Volume discounts may also apply in some circumstances. Source: Aurora_supply_agreement.pdf One source: the whole file. Nothing to send on without rewriting it.
    The work
    DOCXPricing_mechanism_memo.docxReturned in 9 min
    Harcourt & CoPrivileged & confidential

    26 July 2026

    Pricing mechanism — Aurora Supply Agreement

    1.The base price is indexed annually to CPI.cl 6.1
    2.Raw-material costs pass through by reference to the published index.cl 6.3(a)
    3.Delivery is EXW (Incoterms 2020).cl 7.2
    4.A 2% rebate applies to annual volumes above 10,000 units.sch 3, s 4
    5.Invoicing is in USD, net 30.cl 6.5
    Each item cited to its clause.
    Harcourt & Co · Privileged & confidential1 of 1

    Drag the line.

    What we chose to build

    From answers to actual colleagues.

    Memory, execution and communication are one system. The result is less prompt craft and more finished legal work.

    01

    The editable file is the answer

    Native deliverables keep their structure, formulas, citations, numbering and trace.

    02

    The record survives the conversation

    Matter history, firm practice and standing instructions stay available months or years later.

    03

    Initiative stops at the judgment line

    Routine work progresses inside permissions; external communications and legal calls wait for approval.

    04

    Email, Teams and the phone share one memory

    Something said out loud in a meeting on Tuesday is still known on the call on Thursday and in the file that lands on Friday. One matter, three ways in.

    The two of them

    Colleagues.

    Not two products with a shared login. Two people you hand work to, one of whom supervises the other.

    Defined legal work

    The Paralegal

    Email the instruction and the source material. The editable working file returns to the same thread.

    EmailBrief in→DOCX · XLSX · PPTX · bundle back
    Meet The Paralegal →
    Flagship product · includes the full Paralegal

    The Associate

    Give it the matter, not just the task. It remembers firm context, recognises the next move and reaches you by email or phone when judgment is needed.

    Email + phoneInstruction→Matter stays live
    Meet The Associate →
    A more useful test for legal AI

    Judge the file. Judge the follow-through. Judge what still needs the lawyer.

    Bring one real matter. We will show you the working deliverable, its trace and the exact judgment line.

    Request access
    Why Solicia

    Judge it on the file.

    The differences never show in a demo. Drag the line and look at the work.

    An answer
    Summarise the pricing mechanism in the attached. The agreement sets a base price which may be adjusted over time. Certain costs appear to be passed through to the buyer, and freight is addressed separately. Volume discounts may also apply in some circumstances. Source: Aurora_supply_agreement.pdf One source: the whole file.
    The work
    DOCXPricing_mechanism_memo.docxReturned in 9 min
    Harcourt & CoPrivileged & confidential

    26 July 2026

    Pricing mechanism - Aurora Supply Agreement

    1.The base price is indexed annually to CPI.cl 6.1
    2.Raw-material costs pass through by reference to the published index.cl 6.3(a)
    3.Delivery is EXW (Incoterms 2020).cl 7.2
    4.A 2% rebate applies to annual volumes above 10,000 units.sch 3, s 4
    5.Invoicing is in USD, net 30.cl 6.5
    Each item cited to its clause.

    Drag the line.

    One gives you an answer.
    The other hands you the work.

    We know other tools exist.

    So put any of them to this test.

    A different kind of tool.

    What are the termination fees? Generally, fees range from two to four per cent, subject to a number of factors…
    No chat window.

    An answer, produced off the record. No sources, no file, nothing to review.

    UsernamePasswordSign in
    No new platform.

    Real work, but another portal to adopt and another place the matter now lives.

    S
    SoliciaTo: you, by reply
    DOCXAurora_termination_fees.docx
    The reply, on the record.

    The finished file, sourced and checked, filed where the firm already works.

    Solicia takes the third path. It does the work, returns the artefact, and does it inside the record the firm already keeps.

    The inbox is not a preference. It is the record.

    Five reasons the interface was settled thirty years ago.

    Nobody is onboarded onto email. Thirty years of precedent did that already.

    The archive the firm audits and discloses from is already the interface.

    Delegation happens by email today. Solicia joins the habit rather than replacing it.

    Mail security, retention and permissions apply the moment the reply lands.

    Asynchronous, like the work itself. Send the instruction and carry on.

    The mix

    One of them is judgment. One of them is hands.

    Alone, each is the best of its kind. Together they are something the industry has not had before: a staffed desk. The Associate carries the matter and decides; the Paralegal executes to the register; you keep the judgment that matters.

    ARYou
    06:04 the reply landed
    AThe Associate
    06:12 the brief, three files
    PThe Paralegal
    06:41 the checked table
    EMLYour thread08:15 on your thread
    The Associate

    It carries the matter.

    Memory, watch, delegation, a telephone. Add it, and the desk starts working between your emails.

    Meet The Associate
    The Paralegal

    The finest pair of hands.

    Any register job by return of email. Minutes, not days. Real working files. Hire it alone, and every register job is minutes away.

    Meet The Paralegal

    Email either of them directly. Or give the Associate the matter, and let it run the desk.

    Why we build

    We are not building a better chatbot.

    Legal AI settled into a shape: a chat window, a suggestion, a subscription. We think the profession deserves an actual colleague - so that is what we build, and we intend to keep arriving first.

    Real working filesThe first legal AI to return real working files - DOCX that survives a redline, XLSX with live formulas - not prose about them.
    A memoryThe first with a memory that outlives the chat: the matter file, kept for the life of the matter.
    InitiativeThe first with initiative: it wakes on the record at 06:04, not on a prompt at 09:30.
    A direct reportThe first with a direct report - an AI that briefs, supervises and checks another.
    The telephoneThe first you can telephone - and the first with a reason to telephone you.

    None of this came from a feature race. It came from asking what a firm actually hires. Judge it the way you would judge any hire: on the file.

    Read why we built the second hire

    See the difference on your own matter.

    Send a real instruction and judge the file that comes back.

    Request access
    Resources / ROI calculator

    Put your numbers on both hires.

    The Paralegal takes defined work off the team. The Associate takes the carry off your fee earners. Set the inputs for each — everything is computed on this page, and nothing leaves it.

    The Paralegal
    8
    £30,000

    Prefilled from the 2026 UK national average (Indeed, Reed). Adjust to your market.

    The Associate
    24
    £320

    3.4 hours a week per fee earner is our conservative figure for the carry the Associate takes on: context re-loading, chasing, monitoring, status. Argue with it — the sliders are yours.

    Value of returned capacity, each year
    £0

    Defined work handed to the Paralegal and matter carry handed to the Associate, priced at the salary and the blended rate you set, and given back to the people you already pay.

    Hours returned each month
    0
    Colleagues' worth of capacity returned
    0
    Hours back to each fee earner, every month
    0
    Cumulative value across the first year

    The ParalegalThe Associate

    See it on your own matters
    Resources

    The resource hub.

    Briefings from the build, and the numbers behind the argument.

    Letters from the build8 September 2026 · 9 min read

    The second hire

    The Paralegal does the work. The Associate carries the matter. On memory that survives the session, a watch that runs on the record, and work that arrives already checked.

    Read the briefing
    Primer20 September 2026 · 12 min read

    What legal AI actually is

    What these systems do reliably, where they fail, how hallucination is actually contained, and what a firm should expect in the first six months.

    Read the briefing
    Buyer’s guide20 September 2026 · 11 min read

    The best legal AI tools

    There is no single best tool: the leading products do different jobs. The four shapes of legal AI, who is strong in each, and how to compare them.

    Read the briefing
    Security20 September 2026 · 10 min read

    Is legal AI secure enough for client files?

    Firms already trust the cloud with privileged documents. What genuinely differs about AI processing, and the contractual fencing that closes the gap.

    Read the briefing
    Letters from the build2 July 2026 · 10 min read

    Why legal AI is moving to the inbox

    The firm already has an interface it trusts, audits and archives. It has had one for thirty years. Solicia works there: send the instruction, and the finished file comes back by reply.

    Read the briefing
    Security8 July 2026 · 7 min read

    Why law firms banned ChatGPT

    Where prompts actually go in consumer AI tools, why the bans were sensible, and the specific proofs a vendor owes a firm before the ban should lift.

    Read the briefing
    Letters from the build · 8 September 2026 · 9 min read

    The second hire.

    The Paralegal does the work. The Associate carries the matter. Why the second one had to be a different kind of product.

    At 06:04 on a Tuesday, opposing counsel returns the markup on Halcyon. Nobody at the firm is awake. By 08:15, when the partner opens her laptop, the comparison against the agreed position is already sitting on the thread — drafted, checked, and carrying the one point that has moved since Friday. She was not asked for anything overnight. She was not asked for anything at all.

    That is the whole argument for the second hire, and everything below is an explanation of why it took a different kind of product to get there.

    IWhat a chat window cannot hold

    Every legal AI tool shipped this decade starts the day having forgotten the matter. Open it at nine and it does not know what was agreed in March, what the other side withdrew in May, or which of the four clauses in front of you is the only one anyone is actually arguing about. It waits, politely, for you to explain the file again.

    Firms absorb the cost of this without ever putting a number on it. It is the four minutes re-explaining Halcyon to a colleague back from leave. It is the paragraph retyped into a chat window that will not remember it past this session. It is the junior reading the whole bundle a second time because nobody wrote down what changed. None of it is billed. All of it is real.

    No firm would hire an associate who forgot the file every night — brilliant at nine, blank by six, briefed from scratch each morning regardless. Yet that is precisely the arrangement the industry offered when it wired a chat box into legal work. The amnesia was never a limit of the models. It was a shortcut, taken early and then normalised, because remembering is much harder to build than answering.

    IIWhat a firm is buying when it hires

    When a firm hires a good associate it is not buying answers. Associates who only answer what they are asked do not last five years. It is buying three things that never appear in a job advertisement.

    Memory. They know where the indemnity cap landed in round two, and they have never had to be told twice. Initiative. They saw the reply land and had started before anyone asked. Responsibility. The work arrives at the partner’s desk checked, not merely produced — and the one thing that needs a judgment call arrives flagged rather than buried.

    A chat window was never going to grow into any of that.

    Not because the models cannot write a good sentence — they can. Because a conversation has no matter to hold between sessions, no thread to watch while you sleep, and nobody beneath it to check its output before it reaches you. Those are not prompting problems. They are missing parts. So we stopped trying to prompt our way around them and built the parts: a matter file that lives for the life of the file rather than the length of a chat; a watch that runs on the record rather than on a timer; and a direct report the Associate briefs, and checks, before anything reaches your thread.

    Matter file — Project Halcyonkept by The Associate
    Parties

    Halcyon Systems — supplier. Kestrel Group — our client, the customer.

    Position

    Indemnity cap agreed at £2m in round two. Not to be reopened.

    History

    Their first draft sought unlimited liability. Withdrawn 14 May.

    Deadline

    Completion targeted 29 August.

    Maintained continuously. Never asked to catch it up.
    Exhibit — the matter file, kept by the Associate.
    IIIThe desk beneath it

    The two products exist in this order for a reason. The Paralegal came first, because a firm needs a pair of hands before it needs a colleague. Send it the instruction and the material on an ordinary thread; the finished file — the comparison table, the bundle, the signing pack — comes back inside the hour, in your format, sourced line by line.

    The Associate was built to sit above that desk, not to replace it. It holds the matter in the gaps between your emails, wakes when the record moves, and writes the Paralegal’s brief itself, attaching files it fetched itself, before it asks anything of you. Halcyon is the matter we keep returning to internally, because it is the one that settled the shape of the product. The morning it describes now runs much the same way most mornings.

    At 23:47 the thread is quiet and the data room is unchanged, so nothing happens. Nothing is invented to look busy. At 06:04 the markup lands and the Associate wakes. At 06:05 it recalls the position: cap agreed at £2m in round two, unlimited liability withdrawn on 14 May — without asking anyone to remind it. At 06:09 it opens the prior markup and the firm’s own template from the data room, not from a prompt. At 06:12 it briefs the Paralegal: an instruction written out, three files attached, nothing left implicit. At 06:41 the comparison comes back and is checked against the agreed position before it is allowed to move. At 08:15 it is on the thread. One overnight event, carried end to end, and the first a partner hears of it is the finished file.

    IVThe telephone

    The moment that convinced us we had built the right thing was not a demo. It was picking up the phone.

    Not a voice reading a summary back at you — that is a speech feature wearing a phone number. What answers is closer to the associate of fifteen years’ standing who picks up already across the file. Ask, mid-morning, where you landed on the cap, and it answers from the record: £2m, round two, and then adds, unprompted, the one thing that has moved since you last looked. Say once, “ring me if the markup lands before I do”, and it does exactly that and nothing more. It does not ring on a schedule. It does not ring unless you asked it to.

    Call — Project Halcyon06:12, The Associate calling
    Associate

    The Halcyon markup landed at six. You asked to hear first.

    You

    Good. Send Alexandra the comparison once it’s back.

    Exhibit — the call, 06:12.

    That is not a feature bolted onto a chat product. It is what memory sounds like when you make it answer out loud. A system that has to go and look something up before it can speak is telling you, in that pause, that it never held the matter in the first place.

    VWhy we are writing this down

    We are setting out how this works in this much detail because we are not in a feature race, and because the profession has run on the record for far longer than software has existed. Every instruction written down. Every position dated. Every draft attributable to a hand. It is a good system, and it survived a century for a reason.

    What we want from legal AI is narrower than market share. We want it to stop meaning a window that is impressive for one turn and empty of the matter by the next, and start meaning work that belongs on the record: checked before it is sent, attributable to the line that supports it, and genuinely silent — nothing invented to fill the space — wherever the record itself says nothing.

    The first hire does the work. The second one carries it. If a firm reads this and asks its existing vendors for the same three things — a memory that survives the session, a watch that runs on the record, and work that arrives checked — that is a good outcome, whoever ends up building it.

    Request access

    Hire the hands, or staff the desk.

    Onboarding a few firms each month. Tell us which hire you are making, and we will set up the address.

    The Paralegal

    The hands. Any register job by return of email, from day one. For hire alone.

    The Associate

    The desk. Early access - it carries the matter, and it arrives with the Paralegal.

    Which hire?

    A person reads every request, usually the same day.

    We use your name, firm and work email only to answer this request. See our Privacy Policy.

    Nothing to install. Instructions travel by email from day one.

    Paper before work. The DPA and no-training clause are signed before the first instruction.

    On your record. Every reply lands in the archive the firm already keeps.

    Security

    Every step on the record.

    Two hires, one set of controls. What follows is how client material is handled, who holds which key, how long anything is kept, and where you can check each of those yourself.

    Neverused to train a model — ours or anyone's
    0documents shared across firms — ever
    100%of steps logged, in plain language — calls included
    0–∞days' retention — purge on delivery, or never. Your firm sets the clock
    A lawyer working through a marked-up agreement at a boardroom table
    The standard is not ours to set.It is the one your document system already meets.

    Isolation, access discipline, auditability, retention. The same four, applied to the AI.

    Role-based access control

    Named people, narrow keys.

    Access is role-based. Every key belongs to a named person, every action is attributed in the log, and the two hires hold the narrowest role of the three.

    Operator

    Runs the matters. Sends instructions, receives the work, and reads the log of everything they've sent — and nothing they haven't.

    Most of the firm
    Admin

    Holds the dials. The whitelist, retention, connectors and roles — every change signed with a name and written to the log.

    One or two people
    Solicia

    One role, shared by both hires. They read what a matter scopes and write to your thread. They hold no key to settings, senders or retention.

    The staff themselves
    ActionOperatorAdminSOLICIA
    Send instructionsYesYesNever
    See work productTheir mattersAll mattersDelivers, then purges
    Read the audit logTheir mattersEverythingWrites it — append-only
    Approve senders—YesNever
    Set retention & purge—YesEnforces it
    Reach connectorsPer instructionGrant & revokeRead-only, on instruction
    Place or take a callYesYesOnly when asked — logged like an email
    Deliver outside the firm——Never

    Every "yes" above belongs to a named person or to the two hires, and is attributed in the log.

    Client confidentiality

    Your matters, not the market's.

    Most enterprise AI runs every customer through one shared inference service. Solicia does not: each firm’s inference runs in its own dedicated Azure OpenAI account, fenced at Azure’s identity layer, and matters are tenant-isolated and never trained on.

    The shared-service model your matters on the vendor's systems
    Firm A Firm B Firm C Firm D Firm E
    One shared service same endpoint · same queue · vendor's terms
    • Retention is set by the vendor, and can change without your firm’s signature.
    • Material is held on the vendor’s systems, under the vendor’s terms.
    • One shared model endpoint: every customer’s prompts run through the same inference service.
    SOLICIA isolated per firm · dedicated Azure account
    Reeve & Calloway LLPisolated
    Another firmisolated
    Another firmisolated
    • A dedicated Azure OpenAI account per firm — fenced at Azure's identity layer, so one firm's access cannot reach another's.
    • Nothing is pooled or cross-learned between firms.
    • Purged on your schedule — and the purge writes itself to the log.
    Enterprise option: dedicated, single-tenant compute, provisioned per engagement

    The full argument, including where prompts actually go in consumer tools, is in the briefing: Why law firms banned ChatGPT — and what should lift the ban

    The bar we build to

    The same bar as the rest of the stack.

    The document system, the practice management suite and the mail server all carry privileged work, and between them they set the standard a system meets before a firm stops asking about it. Solicia is built to that standard rather than to a separate one for AI.

    ✓Tenant isolation
    ✓Role-based access
    ✓Encryption in transit & at rest
    ✓Audit logging
    ✓Retention policy
    ✓Preferred residency

    If anything on this page would fail your firm's security review, we want to hear about it — admin@solicia.ai, a person reads every note.

    Retention & training

    Ninety days, seven, or none at all.

    The work product returns by reply and lives in your archive. What remains in the workspace sits on a clock your firm winds — presets from 7 to 90 days, a schedule of your own, or purge on delivery, where nothing outlives the reply.

    We delete our copy. Yours stays put.

    Every finished file was already delivered by reply — so when the workspace purges, the work itself is still sitting in your inbox and your archive, for as long as the firm chooses to keep it. Deletion here never touches the record there.

    Retention, set by your firm.

    Change it any time from the admin page — the change is logged, like everything else, and every purge writes itself to the log.

    On delivery 7 days 30 days 90 days Your schedule
    Purge schedule30 days after delivery
    Next purgeFriday, 2:00 am
    Proof it ranLog entry, per purge
    Training

    Your documents train nothing.

    Not our models and not another provider’s. It is a term of your firm’s agreement rather than a policy page.

    • Never used to trainOurs or any other provider's models.
    • Never read to improve the serviceNo human review of client material.
    • Never pooled across firmsNothing is aggregated across firms.
    The controls

    Each control, and where you check it.

    Its standing today, and the page or document that shows it.

    ControlStandingWhere you verify
    Inbound authentication16 checks per emailMatter log
    Sender whitelistEnforcedTeam page
    Role-based accessAdmin · OperatorTeam page
    Workspace isolationPer-firmOn request
    No training on client dataPolicyIn your agreement
    Retention & purgeFirm-set · 0–90 daysLog entry per purge
    Plain-language audit logEvery matter · every step · every callapp.solicia.ai
    EncryptionTLS 1.3 · AES-256Security summary
    Regional residencyFirm-preferredCustomer agreement
    SOC complianceIn progressReport on release

    What Solicia does not do.

    • Train on your documents. Client material is never used to train models.
    • Keep what you've purged. Once material reaches its scheduled purge, no copy remains.
    • Talk to strangers. An address you haven't whitelisted gets no work and no acknowledgement.
    • Learn from one firm to serve another. Workspaces are sealed; nothing crosses between clients.
    • Hold keys it does not need. The two hires are a role in your permission matrix, and the narrowest of the three.

    Ask for the evidence.

    The controls register, the data processing agreement and a sample audit trail, calls included, are available for review before anything is signed.

    Request access